(新春走基层)福建宁德归侨侨眷的年夜饭：东南亚美食大融合******
中新网宁德1月21日电 (吕巧琴 吴允杰)印尼烤饼、烤粽、咖喱鸡、扣肉、大黄鱼……在印尼归侨汤松园的眼中，年味就是除夕年夜饭餐桌上各式各样的菜肴。
“我们家属于‘大融合菜系’，年夜饭非常丰盛。”21日，现年67岁的汤松园在福建宁德市笑着对记者说，除了准备印尼菜系与宁德本地菜外，受越南归侨好友“熏陶”，还会准备一些越南菜。
汤松园所在的华侨新村社区新春元素随处可见。 受访者 供图印尼菜咖喱味要浓才好吃，宁德大黄鱼用印尼菜的做法加工别有风味，印尼烤饼必须要有……谈起年夜饭的准备，汤松园侃侃而谈，“也不是过年才吃这些，现在日子好了，每天都吃得很丰盛。”
1961年，汤松园随父母回国，先期被安置在厦门同安的华侨农场，1965年又被安置到宁德市东湖塘华侨农场。
1965年，东湖塘华侨农场在宁德三都澳畔创建，由归侨与当地民工数万人填海筑堤围垦而成，先后安置了印尼、马来西亚、越南等地归侨4000多人。
“当时相当穷，吃白米饭就是一种奢望，每天都盼着过年，因为过年就有肉吃，有新衣服穿，现在的孩子根本想象不到。”回忆起当时的苦日子，汤松园仍记忆犹新。
华侨新村社区工作人员张贴“福”字。 受访者 供图1997年，东湖塘华侨农场获批成立闽东华侨经济开发区，1999年5月升级为省级经济开发区。2006年4月，闽东华侨经济开发区与闽东工业园区整合，更名为福建东侨经济开发区。2012年12月，经国务院批准，东侨经济开发区再度升级为国家级经济技术开发区。
历经多年发展，如今的东侨经济技术开发区坐拥3800亩东湖、2000多亩西陂塘以及国家级湿地公园，四面环绕保持生态原貌的南岸公园、北岸公园、塔山公园等休闲景观，已是一个宜业宜居家园，2021年度综合发展水平在全国217个国家级经济技术开发区中位列第22位。
“现在的生活和以前比，可以说是翻天覆地，每天吃的有鱼有肉，房子住得也很舒心。”汤松园说，特别是各级党委政府都非常关心归侨侨眷，逢年过节都会来看望慰问。
退休后从事社区工作的汤松园，近段时间来都在忙着帮助上门慰问社区里的归侨侨眷，除送上慰问金、慰问品外，还张罗着在社区内张贴春联、悬挂大红灯笼。汤松园说，除了新春慰问外，也希望用这些新年装饰让社区里的归侨侨眷都能感受到浓浓年味。
与汤松园有着同样想法的还有“侨三代”、侨企宁德市闽澳华侨汽车服务有限公司总经理黄超伟，他在公司的每个门上都贴上了春联。
“对我来说，年味就是这些春联、灯笼，看着就非常吉祥喜庆。”黄超伟说，特别是近些年宁德发展快速，城区环境设施也日益完善，春节期间街道两旁悬挂着的彩灯、灯带等装饰特别有年味。
黄超伟的外公是马来西亚归侨。“小时候过年，外公会做特色烤粽；现在他年纪大了，也很少做了。”谈起马来西亚美食，黄超伟回忆满满。
“今年年夜饭，将继续与外公一家团聚。”谈及新年愿望，黄超伟说，希望借着宁德快速发展的东风，接好上一代发展的接力棒。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
